United Nations Agenda

Post to Twitter


United Nations Agenda

Most Americans are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program known as Agenda 21. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development created Agenda 21 as a sustainability agenda which is arguably an amalgamation of socialism and extreme environmentalism brushed with anti-American, anti-capitalist overtones.

Agenda 21

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.

The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.

The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002. Click here to read more about Agenda 21.

Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth.

Smart growth is not science; it is political dogma combined with an insidious dose of social engineering. Smart growth is a wedding wherein zoning code is married with government sponsored housing initiatives to accomplish government’s goal of social re-engineering. It urbanizes rural towns with high-density development, and gerrymanders population centers through the use of housing initiatives that enable people with weak patterns of personal financial responsibility to acquire homes in higher-income areas. This has the effect of shifting the voting patterns of rural municipalities from Right to Left.”

Smart growth plans usurp property rights and constitutional rights. Local officials, at the behest of State Government, revise zoning laws to fit into a “smart code” zoning template. A massive reshuffling of property rights ensues. Farmers may lose subdivision rights; conservation land adjacent to population centers may be rezoned into commercial employment centers; and low-density land in small towns is re-designated as growth area and rezoned to accommodate diverse housing including high-density apartments and condominiums.

Finally, a healthy dose of federal or state sponsored housing initiatives is embraced to ensure communities are properly balanced. The net effect of these plans is to create highly urbanized population centers throughout otherwise rural counties, while simultaneously limiting the availability of land for suburban and estate subdivisions, as these are considered an unsustainable waste of land by Agenda 21 disciples.

Clearly, smart growth plans will impact Americans’ future choices in where and how they live. Furthermore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal and state agencies may attempt to deny grant funds to states and cities that do not adopt smart growth plans. Eminent Domain ruling by the Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v City of New London. Under Eminent Domain rulings, property owners usually receive compensation for their losses.

Conversely, smart growth municipal plans, required by statute, enable municipalities to change zoning laws and engage in other regulatory actions that devalue property, restrict off-conveyances, and otherwise erode property values without payment of any compensation to the property owner.

Most Americans will remain unaware of the implications of smart growth and Agenda 21 until after it is put into operation by formal proclamation, as a law, in their own backyards. Ironically, these plans are more insidious than the Conversely, smart growth municipal plans, required by statute, enable municipalities to change zoning laws and engage in other regulatory actions that devalue property, restrict off-conveyances, and otherwise erode property values without payment of any compensation to the property owner.

Smart growth has another interesting unintended consequence: it can disrupt conventional alliances and lead to strange political bedfellows. Rural urbanization plans may raise intense anger of environmental groups while simultaneously stirring the wrath of both conservative and liberal residents that want to maintain the rural fabric of their communities. Conversely, developers, sensing opportunity, may side with government smart growth bureaucrats in support of these plans.

Regardless of political orientation, two indisputable facts remain. Agenda 21 is a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty, and it is coming to a neighborhood near you.

Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn’t care less whether it’s called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department.

The plan, if enacted, proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights:


  • Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks.
  • Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers.
  • Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums.
  • Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities.
  • Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods. 

Click here to Read Guide

Now in my opinion, if you give the United Nations this kind of power of the peoples land and personal property, they will take even more liberties. Correct me if I am wrong, but if you believe Absolute Power Corrupts, then Total Power Totally Corrupts Absolutely! This is the United Nations Agenda to completely control all countries in their ways of thinking. I say NO to their complete power and control!

For those that do not understand yet, this means they are able to take possession of your land and allocate it to whatever they please. If it was farmland that was in your family for generations, oh well, that’s Tough! Now if you do not take what they offer for it, they can Condemn Your Property and take it and you get nothing. This is happening all across America today. It is time we Stopped this Control and gave it back to the people and Property Owners.

Sure there are some good things that the United Nations have done but there has to be a limit set to what kind of controll they can have. We the People, have to set that control limit and not allow complete power to them.

If we continue to allow them control you will see Carbon Tax and much more go down with their Climate and Energy control that you will not like or will you be able to live with their agenda.

Now to be fair with the United Nations, I am also inserting their link so you can actually see some of the good things they are doing. Not all of which I agree with but, nonetheless, they are doing them and they do not have to have the peoples permission to do them because they are not government controlled. That means you have no say so at all.

You may want to learn about the Codex Alimentariusthat the United Nations is pushing all across the world as well. Check out the information below.

Do You Still want the United States to be a member of the United Nations?

Watch these Videos!


Agenda 21 The UN’s Diabolical Plan for the World is Explained

The next 4 videos is info about what the United Nations is doing.

Codex Alimentarius Commission

Part 1 of 4


Part 2 of 4



Part 3 of 4


Part 4 of 4


Again! Do You Still want the United States to be a member of the United Nations – UN?

 Do You Still want the United States to be a member of the World Trade Organization – WTO?





Post to Twitter

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Want to Leave a Reply?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Flickr button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button Youtube button